THE WELCH COMPANY
440 Davis Court #1602
San Francisco, CA 94111-2496
415 781 5700
S U M M A R Y
DIARY: December 4, 89 09:19 AM .......;
Rod Welch
CSCJ issue analysis, "Mislocated Dowels;" schedule analysis, discussion
1...
2...Summary/Objective
.Burden of Proof
...Discussion with Alex
..............
Click here to comment!
CONTACTS
0201 - O-0199 0201 High Point Schaer 206 386 5990 fax 5993SUBJECTS
CSCJ, Litigation, Issue Analysis
Mislocated Dowels
Schedule review reports
by HPS
Work plan by Gordon/others
Schedule as-built inadequate
Evidence & Burden of Proof
0909 - ..
0910 - Summary/Objective
0911 -
091101 - Received as-built CPM from Gordon and found it inadequate. HPS
091102 - will use schedule analysis procedures at ref SDS 1. Gordon reports
091103 - as-built CPM conflicts with OKA inspection reports. HPS must report to
091104 - NW missing schedule data supplied by NW. Gordon says he submitted
091105 - report on missing schedule data.
091106 -
091107 -
0912 -
0913 -
0914 - Received ref DRT 1
0915 -
091501 - This is a schedule "as-built" from JS41 report consisting of 3 large
091502 - size sheets prepared by Gordon. It shows some CPM activities for
091503 - contract B from project inception to approximately April 1986, about
091504 - 4 months into the job.
091505 -
091506 - Gordon's comment on his transmittal letter indicates the purpose of
091507 - this document is "...to analyse Schedule aspects for the dowel
091508 - problem."
091509 - ..
091510 - Roy and Kelly assembled the thing and hung it on the wall in my
091511 - office.
091512 -
091513 - It purports to be an "as-built" CPM. I found the following
091514 - difficulties:
091515 -
091516 - The activity to survey the existing dowels ran approximately 2.5
091517 - months.
091518 -
091519 - The activity to install the crane foundation had no precedent
091520 - actitivites. Daily Inspection Reports may indicate what controlled
091521 - this matter.
091522 -
091523 - The Survey Existing Dowel activity is shown as CONTINUOUS, contrary
091524 - to actual intermitant performance agreed to have occurred by the
091525 - parties. There were long periods when no work was performed on
091526 - this Survey activity. The Daily Inspection Reports may disclose
091527 - this information.
091528 -
091529 - There are no logical connections between the survey activity and the
091530 - wall construction activities. There are no activities to remedy
091531 - mislocated dowels following discovery under the survey activity and
091532 - prior to the wall construction.
091533 -
091534 - The most egregious error of the schedule is the use of finish to
091535 - finish activity constraints. This prevents a clear understanding
091536 - of causation, which is the objective of CPM and essential to
091537 - determination of schedule impact.
091538 -
091539 -
091540 - ..
091541 - Proposed schedule analysis procedures
091542 - Discussion with Roy & Rob Edgerton
091543 -
091544 - Roy asked me how I think we should proceed, in light of the quality
091545 - of the data. Rob Edgerton participated in the discussion on the
091546 - matter of pointing out defects in the as-built data.
091547 -
091548 - I indicated HPS should perform the steps set out in ref SDS 1 i.e.
091549 - develop an as-built CPM using the job records, principally the
091550 - Daily Inspection Reports, and from that determine the as-built
091551 - critical path.
091552 -
091553 - Strategy on Use of Evidence
091554 - Applying Burden of Proof
091555 -
091556 - A fallback procedure would be to use the Summary monthly progress
091557 - reports to create a network of the milestone nodes and events cited
091558 - by OKA as significant through the course of the job.
091559 -
091560 - Note: A more economical procedure would be to simply wait for
091561 - plaintiff's to submit their proposed "as-built" CPM or any other
091562 - evidence upon which they intend to rely at trial to establish
091563 - causation. HPS then need merely spot check it for accuracy and
091564 - logic. Let the other guy pay for assembling the thing.
091565 -
091566 - Until then HPS would testify the as-built data supplied by the
091567 - parties does not establish entitlement to extra compensation.
091568 -
091569 - HPS can still assemble fragnets on things like submittals,
091570 - separate issues using chronologies.
091571 -
091572 - HPS must report to counsel on deficiencies in the record supplied
091573 - for schedule analysis relative to the OKA contract so counsel
091574 - can go on record as having requested it. This will require OKA,
091575 - Blount and Amoroso to either supply the data or bar its use at
091576 - trial (or form the basis to seek a motion to give HPS adequate
091577 - time to analyse it).
091578 -
091579 -
091580 -
091581 -
091582 - For each Issue HPS should develop a fragnet using the chronology
091583 - prepared for the Issue to show the relationship with the critical
091584 - path. This would provide a basis to complete the Issue analysis
091585 - with respect to total DHP exposure.
091586 -
091587 -
091588 -
091589 - Discussion with Alex
091590 -
091591 - Roy and I explained the defects in the "as-built" CPM supplied by
091592 - Gordon, as noted above.
091593 -
091594 - Alex said he originally requested this submittal from Gordon
091595 - believing it would be sufficient, or nearly so to support Issue
091596 - analysis. He discussed this further with Gordon last Friday after
091597 - Gordon issued this material, ref DRT 1, and as a result he and
091598 - Gordon agreed to a different scenario, similar to that described
091599 - above.
091600 -
091601 - Alex expressed deep surprize and concern about the inadequacies in
091602 - the OKA "as-built." He asked that Roy and I call Gordon to discuss
091603 - procedures for dealing with this situation.
091604 -
091605 -
091606 -
091607 -
091608 - Discussion with Gordon
091609 - OKA "As-built" CPM inaccurate
091610 - ..
091611 - Gordon advised examination of the OKA Daily Inspection Reports
091612 - shows conflicting information with respect to actual start and
091613 - completion dates for the activities listed in the "as-built"
091614 - schedule identified as JS41.
091615 -
091616 - It is essential to identify the extent of this disparity in order
091617 - to make a case of failure to perform by OKA as part of the defense
091618 - for DHP.
091619 - ..
091620 - Gordon feels he can prepare an as-built fragnet using the
091621 - chronology for the "mislocated dowels" sent to him by Roy last week,
091622 - ref 3 and 4 line 051111, 090701,
091623 -
091624 - Should receive as-built fragnet on Mislocated Dowels.
091625 -
091626 -
091627 -
0917 -
Distribution. . . . See "CONTACTS"