223315 -
223316 - 
223318 - ..
223319 - After Ken finished with the customer, assisted him accessing c22 OS.
223321 - ..
223322 - We opened Windows 10 Enterprise on c22 dual boot system.
223324 - ..
223325 - Initially, Core Temp does not show 20 degree difference between cores
223326 - for processor #1 and 2; rather Core Temp showed only a 10 degree
223327 - difference like the BIOS, per above. ref SDS 0 AC5M
223329 - ..
223330 - Ran Intel IPDT test. As with prior tests, c22 passed the first test
223331 - with temperature 62 degrees below max. Astonishingly, Core Temp
223332 - showed all cores on processor #2 did not exceed 80, whereas all the
223333 - prior tests showed all cores > 90 and many reached 100 degrees. Since
223334 - temperatures on this test here at Fry's did not exceed 80, the fans
223335 - did not increase speed, and so there was no vibration problem today
223336 - during system testing.
223338 - ..
223339 - Congratulated Ken on successful repair of c22 without lifting a
223340 - finger.
223342 - ..
223343 - We ran 2 more tests, with the same result.
223345 - ..
223346 - Ran Passmark Performance test, and got same result.
223348 - ..
223349 - This seeming miracle of 10 degree drop in processor #2 temperature
223350 - aligns with erratic IPDT tests showing c22 easily "Passed" with both
223351 - processors 62 degrees below max, and other tests failed, demonstrating
223352 - a 62 degree swing.
223354 - ..
223355 - Ken feels results today, align with erratic c22 processor #2
223356 - temperatures > 90 degrees and up to 100 degrees, which is 10 degrees
223357 - above maximum 90 degrees for E5-2690v3 processor; yet, Intel Processor
223358 - Diagnostic Tool (IPDT) testing reports both processors passed by 60
223359 - degrees below max...
223361 - ..
223362 - This record seems conflicting and indicates c22 may be performing out
223363 - of spec...
223364 -
223365 - Copying files across the network temperature processor #2 max 90...
223366 -
223367 - 
223369 - ..
223370 - Intel Processor Diagnostic Tool tests
223371 - 1 cor Max 100, 8 cores > 90, IPDT reports 12 degrees below max (78)
223372 -
223373 - 
223374 -
223375 - 
223377 - ..
223378 - 3 cores Max 100, 7 cores > 90, IPDT reports c22 PASS 63 degrees below max (27)
223379 -
223380 - 
223381 -
223382 -
223383 - 2 cores Max 100, 7 cores > 90, IPDT reports c22 62 degrees below max (28)
223385 - ..
223386 - 
223388 - ..
223389 - 
223390 -
223392 - ..
223393 - Fail...
223394 -
223395 - 
223397 - ..
223398 - Pass
223399 -
223400 - 
223401 -
223403 - ..
223404 - Ken wants to make further review of issues presented in the Asus
223405 - letter on 160324 1118. ref SDS 34 Q94Y
223407 - ..
223408 - Accordingly, left c22 at Fry's. At this time there is no evident
223409 - solution to fix high temperatures on processor #2, to bring them into
223410 - alignment with processor #1 temperatures < 50 when all 12 cores are
223411 - run at 100%.
223412 -
223413 -
223414 -
223415 -
223416 -
223417 -
223418 -
223419 -
223420 -
223421 -
223422 -
223423 -
223424 -
223425 -
2235 -